Imaging Characteristics and Clinical Utility of Half-Dose vs Full-Dose Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography.

PURPOSE: In early 2022, a fluorescein shortage occurred in the United States. To meet the standard of care for patients who required ultra-wide fundus fluorescein angiography (UWFFA), a regimen of half-dose (250mg) sodium fluorescein (10%) was adopted instead of the full-dose (500mg) at the Cole Eye Institute (CEI). In this paper, we compare the image quality, clinical utility, and the side effect profile of half-dose vs full-dose fluorescein in UWFFA for a cohort of stable patients. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: Patients with retinal vascular disease were included if they received half-dose and full-dose UWFFA (Optos California, Dunfermline, UK) within 6 months at the CEI. Eyes were excluded if they received intraocular injections, laser procedures, new immunosuppression, and worsened or improved inflammation on clinical examination. METHODS, INTERVENTION, OR TESTING: Quantitative assessment of vascular leakage was performed using a machine-learning enhanced automated segmentation platform. Leakage from late-phase UWFFA images was compared between half-dose and full-dose images. Qualitative assessment of image quality and relative vascular leakage was performed by 2 masked independent reviewers. Side effects after fluorescein administration were recorded for each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Masked leakage grading and automated leakage scores. RESULTS: There were 52 eyes of 35 patients, 42 (81%) uveitic, 5 (9%) diabetic, and 4 (8%) normal controls. Patients had no change to their visual acuity (LogMAR mean 0.3±0.6), anterior chamber and vitreous cell between UFFWA's. UWFFA images were deemed of equal quality and leakage by both masked reviewers (78-87% agreement, kappa 0.642). Automated leakage analysis showed mildly increased leakage in half-dose images overall (3.8% vs 2.8%, p=0.01), and in the macula (1.5% vs 0.6%, p=0.01). Side effects included nausea (half (n=3, 9%) vs full (n=2, 6%), p=0.69) and urticaria (n=0, 0% vs n=1, 2%, p=0.99) and were not different between doses. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, half dose UWFFA produced images that were of similar quality, clinical utility and with a similar side effect profile compared to full dose. Half dose UWFFA can be used to accurately assess the retinal vasculature and could be used primarily as a method to save cost and prevent waste.

Vision loss reduction with avacincaptad pegol for geographic atrophy: a 12-month post hoc analysis of the GATHER1 and GATHER2 trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of reduction in geographic atrophy (GA) lesion growth on visual acuity in the GATHER trials using categorical outcome measures. DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled phase 3 trials. PARTICIPANTS: Aged ≥50 years with non-center point involving GA and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 25-80 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in the study eye. METHODS: GATHER1 consisted of 2 parts. In Part 1, 77 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to avacincaptad pegol (ACP) 1 mg, ACP 2 mg, and sham. In Part 2, 209 patients were randomized 1:2:2 to ACP 2 mg, ACP 4 mg, and sham. In GATHER2, patients were randomized 1:1 to ACP 2 mg (n=225) and sham (n=223). A post hoc analysis of 12-month data for pooled ACP 2 mg and sham groups is reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of study eyes that experienced ≥10-, ≥15-, or ≥20-BCVA ETDRS letter loss from baseline to month 12; time-to-event analysis of persistent vision loss of ≥10-, ≥15-, or ≥20-BCVA letters from baseline at ≥2 consecutive visits over 12 months; proportion of study eyes with BCVA loss to a level below driving eligibility threshold at month 12 among those eligible to drive at baseline. RESULTS: Lower proportions of study eyes experienced ≥10-, ≥15-, or ≥20-BCVA letter loss from baseline over 12 months with ACP 2 mg (11.6%, 4.0%, and 1.6%, respectively) vs sham (14.1%, 7.6%, and 4.5%, respectively). There was a reduction in the risk of persistent loss of ≥15-BCVA ETDRS letters with ACP 2 mg (3.4%) vs sham (7.8%) through 12 months. A lower proportion of study eyes treated with ACP 2 mg reached the threshold for driving ineligibility vs sham by 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ACP 2 mg delayed the risk of progression to persistent vision loss (ie, ≥10-, ≥15-, and ≥20-BCVA letter loss or BCVA loss to a level below driving eligibility threshold) vs sham over 12 months.

Bispecific VEGF-A and Angiopoietin-2 Antagonist RO-101 Preclinical Efficacy in Model of Neovascular Eye Disease.

Objective: To investigate preclinical data regarding the efficacy and biocompatibility of a bispecific protein, RO-101, with effects on VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) for use in retinal diseases. Design: Experimental study. Subjects: Brown Norway rats and New Zealand White Cross rabbits. Methods: Preclinical study data of RO-101 in terms of target-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay binding affinity to VEGF-A and Ang-2, vitreous half-life, inhibition of target-receptor interaction, laser choroidal neovascular membrane animal model, human umbilical vein endothelial cell migration, and biocompatibility was obtained. Where applicable, study data were compared with other anti-VEGF agents. Main Outcome Measures: Binding affinity, half-life, biocompatibility, and efficacy of RO-101. Neovascularization prevention by RO-101. Results: RO-101 demonstrated a strong binding affinity for VEGF-A and Ang-2 and in vitro was able to inhibit binding to the receptor with higher affinity than faricimab. The half-life of RO-101 is comparable to or longer than current VEGF inhibitors used in retinal disease. RO-101 was found to be biocompatible with retinal tissue in Brown Norway rats. RO-101 was as effective or more effective than current anti-VEGF therapeutics in causing regression of neovascular growth in vivo. Conclusions: RO-101 is a promising candidate for use in retinal diseases. In preclinical models, RO-101 demonstrated similar or higher regression of neovascular growth to current anti-VEGF therapeutics with comparable or longer half-life. It also demonstrates a strong binding affinity for VEGF-A and Ang-2. It also was shown to be biocompatible with retinal tissue in animal studies, indicating potential compatibility for use in humans. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Biosimilars of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for ophthalmic diseases: A review.

The development of intravitreally injected biologic medicines (biologics) acting against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) substantially improved the clinical outcomes of patients with common VEGF-driven retinal diseases. The relatively high cost of branded agents, however, represents a financial burden for most healthcare systems and patients, likely resulting in impaired access to treatment and poorer clinical outcomes for some patients. Biosimilar medicines (biosimilars) are clinically equivalent, potentially economic alternatives to reference products. Biosimilars approved by leading health authorities have been demonstrated to be similar to the reference product in a comprehensive comparability exercise, generating the totality of evidence necessary to support analytical, pre-clinical, and clinical biosimilarity. Anti-VEGF biosimilars have been entering the field of ophthalmology in the US since 2022. We review regulatory and scientific concepts of biosimilars, the biosimilar development landscape in ophthalmology, with a specific focus on anti-VEGF biosimilars, and discuss opportunities and challenges facing the uptake of biosimilars.

Suprachoroidal Space Injection Technique: Expert Panel Guidance.

PURPOSE: To develop professional guidelines for best practices for suprachoroidal space (SCS) injection, an innovative technique for retinal therapeutic delivery, based on current published evidence and clinical experience. METHODS: A panel of expert ophthalmologists reviewed current published evidence and clinical experience during a live working group meeting to define points of consensus and key clinical considerations to inform the development of guidelines for in-office SCS injection. RESULTS: Core consensus guidelines for in-office SCS injection were reached and reported by the expert panel. Current clinical evidence and physician experience supported SCS injection as a safe and effective method for delivering retinal and choroidal therapeutics. The panel established consensus on the rationale for SCS injection, including potential benefits relative to other intraocular delivery methods, and current best practices in patient preparation, pre- and peri-injection management, SCS-specific injection techniques, and post-injection management and follow-up. CONCLUSION: These expert panel guidelines may support and promote standardization of SCS injection technique, with the goal of optimizing patient safety and outcomes. Some aspects of the procedure may reasonably be modified based on clinical setting and physician judgement, as well as areas requiring additional study.

Considerations for the Identification and Management of Geographic Atrophy: Recommendations from an Expert Panel.

Newly approved treatments for patients with geographic atrophy are changing the treatment paradigm, highlighting the need for eye care providers (ECPs) to have a set of recommendations on how to best manage GA patients. Here, we outline how to identify various stages of age-related macular degeneration including geographic atrophy (GA) by examining optimal management scenarios implicating various ECPs and reviewing treatment considerations for patients with GA. Early identification of GA will lead to optimal patient outcomes, while a standardized management scenario will reduce clinical burden among ECPs treating patients with GA.

Compartmental Exudative Dynamics in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Volumetric Outcomes and Impact of Volatility in a Phase III Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To examine retinal feature dynamics in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with anti-VEGF therapy and the relationship of these features with visual acuity. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the phase III, randomized, HAWK nAMD clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Participants randomized to the brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg arms of the trial. METHODS: Spectral-domain OCT scans collected at 4-week intervals were analyzed using an automated machine learning-enhanced segmentation and feature-extraction platform with manual verification. Quantitative volumetric measures of retinal and exudative features were exported at multiple timepoints over 48 weeks. Volatility of exudative features was calculated as the standard deviation of each feature value during the maintenance phase (week 12-48) of treatment. These features were examined for their associations with anatomic and functional outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Longitudinal intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) volume, subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM) volume, ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity (EZ-retinal pigment epithelium [RPE] volume/thickness), and correlation with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: Intraretinal fluid, SRF, and SHRM demonstrated significant volumetric reduction from baseline with anti-VEGF therapy (P < 0.001 at each timepoint). Ellipsoid zone integrity measures demonstrated significant improvement from baseline (P < 0.001 at each timepoint). Both EZ integrity and SHRM measures correlated significantly with BCVA at all timepoints (EZ-RPE volume: 0.38 ≤ r ≤ 0.47; EZ-RPE central subfield thickness: 0.22 ≤ r ≤ 0.41; SHRM volume: -0.33 ≤ r ≤ -0.44). After treatment initiation, correlations of IRF and SRF volume with BCVA were weak or nonsignificant. Eyes with lower volatility of IRF, SRF, and SHRM volumes during the maintenance phase showed greater improvements in EZ integrity (all P < 0.01) and greater gains in BCVA (all P < 0.01) at week 48 compared with eyes with higher volatility in those exudative parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative measures of SHRM volume and EZ integrity correlated more strongly with BCVA than retinal fluid volumes during treatment. High volatility of exudative parameters, including SRF, during the maintenance phase of treatment was associated with loss of EZ integrity and BCVA. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and retinal non-perfusion in diabetic retinopathy: A meta-analysis of randomised trials.

PURPOSE: Retinal non-perfusion (RNP) is fundamental to disease onset and progression in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Whether anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy can modify RNP progression is unclear. This investigation quantified the impact of anti-VEGF therapy on RNP progression compared with laser or sham at 12 months. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were performed; Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from inception to 4th March 2022. The change in any continuous measure of RNP at 12 months and 24 months was the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Outcomes were reported utilising standardised mean differences (SMD). The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version-2 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines informed risk of bias and certainty of evidence assessments. RESULTS: Six RCTs (1296 eyes) and three RCTs (1131 eyes) were included at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Meta-analysis demonstrated that RNP progression may be slowed with anti-VEGF therapy compared with laser/sham at 12 months (SMD: -0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.29, -0.06; p = 0.003; I2 = 0; GRADE rating: LOW) and 24-months (SMD: -0.21; 95% CI: -0.37, -0.05; p = 0.009; I2 = 28%; GRADE rating: LOW). The certainty of evidence was downgraded due to indirectness and due to imprecision. CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF treatment may slightly impact the pathophysiologic process of progressive RNP in DR. The dosing regimen and the absence of diabetic macular edema may impact this potential effect. Future trials are needed to increase the precision of the effect and inform the association between RNP progression and clinically important events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022314418.

Subthreshold Compared with Threshold Macular Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

TOPIC: To compare the efficacy and safety of subthreshold macular laser to conventional focal laser photocoagulation for the treatment of vision loss secondary to diabetic macular edema (DME). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Macular laser remains an important and cost effective treatment option for vision loss secondary to DME. Although anti-VEGF therapy is often first-line, macular laser is of utility in low-resource or remote settings, for patients at risk of loss to follow-up, and for DME not meeting country-specific reimbursement criteria for anti-VEGF therapy. Subthreshold laser is a modality that does not produce clinical or histologic evidence of thermal damage, thereby potentially limiting the common complications of conventional laser. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to September 28, 2022. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects modeling. Data were collected at 12 and 24 months for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness, diabetic retinopathy severity scale, rate of adverse events, rate of enrolled patients not completing treatment, rate of patients receiving retreatment, and quality-of-life measures. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using Cochrane's Risk-of-Bias version 2 and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) frameworks, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed between subthreshold laser modalities and evaluated with Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses tool. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs comprising 514 eyes receiving conventional laser and 574 eyes receiving subthreshold laser were included. Subthreshold laser likely results in no difference to BCVA (moderate GRADE certainty) compared with conventional laser. Conventional laser demonstrated a small, statistically significant improvement in central retinal thickness (low GRADE certainty); however, the magnitude of this improvement is unlikely to be clinically important. There may not be a difference in the rate of adverse events (low GRADE certainty) at 12 months when comparing subthreshold laser to conventional laser for DME. CONCLUSION: Randomized controlled trial literature to date suggests subthreshold laser to be as effective as conventional laser in the treatment of DME. Increased follow-up duration is needed to observe any long-term safety benefit from reduced retinal damage. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Short-Term Outcomes of Faricimab in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Prior Anti-VEGF Therapy.

PURPOSE: A subset of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) experience treatment burden and suboptimal response with anti-VEGF therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of switching to a novel, bispecific agent, faricimab, in patients with nAMD currently treated with anti-VEGF. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients with nAMD previously treated with anti-VEGF and switched to intravitreal faricimab injection (IFI) at the Cleveland Clinic's Cole Eye Institute. METHODS: Switching and administration schedule of IFI was at the discretion of the clinician. Visual acuity (VA) and macular OCT parameters, including central subfield thickness (CST), maximum pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height, and presence of subretinal (SRF) or intraretinal fluid (IRF), were assessed at baseline (day of first IFI) and after each IFI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Central subfield thickness and presence of IRF or SRF after ≥ 3 IFIs. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six eyes of 106 patients were included in the analysis with a mean follow-up time of 24.3 ± 5.2 weeks. Before switching to IFI, patients received a mean of either aflibercept (20.0 ± 8.4, mean ± standard deviation), bevacizumab (7 ± 8.9), ranibizumab (1.9 ± 8.5), or brolucizumab (0.3 ± 1.6) injections. The most common agent used before switching to IFI was aflibercept (n = 110, 87%), and the mean treatment interval with any anti-VEGF was 5.6 ± 1.6 weeks before switching. Central subfield thickness was reduced from baseline after the first IFI (266.8 ± 64.7 vs. 249.8 ± 58.6 µm, P = 0.02) and persisted over the 3 IFIs (P = 0.01). Pigment epithelial detachment height was reduced after the third IFI (249.6 ± 179.0 vs. 206.9 ± 130.0 µm, P = 0.01). The mean VA (62.9 vs. 62.7 approximate ETDRS letters, P = 0.42) and interval between injections (6.3 vs. 5.7 weeks, P = 0.16) was similar after the third IFI compared with baseline. Eleven (8.7%) eyes were switched back to their previous anti-VEGF, including 2 (1.6%) eyes from 1 patient with intraocular inflammation requiring cessation of IFI. There were no other adverse events from switching. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to faricimab resulted in a reduction in mean CST (-11.6 µm, P = 0.01) and PED height (-44.2 µm, P = 0.01) after 3 injections, with stable VA and at a similar treatment interval to prior anti-VEGF therapy. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

The effect of complement C3 or C5 inhibition on geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.

With the introduction of therapies to treat geographic atrophy (GA), GA management in clinical practice is now possible. A living systematic review can provide access to timely and robust evidence synthesis. This review found that complement factor 3 and 5 (C3 and C5) inhibition compared to sham likely reduces change in square root GA area at 12 months and untransformed GA area at 24 months. There is likely little to no difference in the rate of systemic treatment-emergent adverse events compared to sham. C3 and C5 inhibition, however, likely does not improve best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months, and the evidence is uncertain regarding change in BCVA at 24 months. Higher rates of ocular treatment emergent adverse effects with complement inhibition occur at 12 months and likely at 24 months. Complement inhibition likely results in new onset neovascular age-related macular degeneration at 12 months. This living meta-analysis will continuously incorporate new evidence.

Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus (GA-MAC): a Delphi panel study on identification, diagnosis and treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: With a paradigm shift in geographic atrophy (GA) treatments now available, establishing consensus on the identification and diagnosis of the disease along with considerations for management of patients with GA will assist eye care professionals (ECP) in their day-to-day practices, leading to improved patient outcomes. METHODS: A modified Delphi panel process (Geographic Atrophy Management Consensus) consisting of three total surveys and one virtual live meeting held between survey 2 and survey 3. Data were collected from July to October 2022. Participants included expert members of the eye care community that have demonstrated outstanding leadership among peers: a steering committee with three ECPs and a 15-member panel divided between five optometrists, five comprehensive ophthalmologists and five retina specialists. Consensus on statements related to the management of patients with GA was calculated using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: At the conclusion of the third survey, consensus was reached on 91% of the 77 statements. Critical consensus topics include: (1) optical coherence tomography as the favoured method to diagnose and monitor GA, (2) preferred practice patterns regarding referral of patients to retina specialists and (3) treatment criteria given the advent of emerging therapeutics for GA. CONCLUSIONS: Generating awareness of early signs of disease development, progression and identifying the best tools to evaluate GA establishes ideal management and referral strategies. Given the paradigm shift in GA management driven by approved therapies, coupled with the fact that the disease is progressive resulting in devastating vision loss, these strategies are critical to ensure best overall outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol in patients with geographic atrophy (GATHER2): 12-month results from a randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Geographic atrophy is an advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration that can lead to irreversible vision loss and high burden of disease. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol 2 mg in reducing geographic atrophy lesion growth. METHODS: GATHER2 is a randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled, 24-month, phase 3 trial across 205 retina clinics, research hospitals, and academic institutions globally. To be eligible, patients had to be aged 50 years or older with non-centrepoint-involving geographic atrophy and best corrected visual acuity between 20/25 and 20/320 in the study eye. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to monthly avacincaptad pegol 2 mg administered as a 100 µL intravitreal injection or sham for the first 12 months. Randomisation was performed using an interactive response technology system with stratification by factors known to be of prognostic importance in age-related macular degeneration. Patients, investigators, study centre staff, sponsor personnel, and data analysts were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was geographic atrophy lesion size measured by fundus autofluorescence at baseline, month 6, and month 12. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat and safety populations, respectively. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04435366. FINDINGS: Between June 22, 2020, and July 23, 2021, 1422 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 448 were enrolled and randomly assigned to avacincaptad pegol 2 mg (n=225) or sham (n=223). One patient in the sham group did not receive study treatment and was excluded from analyses. There were 154 (68%) female patients and 71 (32%) male patients in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group, and 156 (70%) female patients and 66 (30%) male patients in the sham group. From baseline to month 12, the mean rate of square-root-transformed geographic atrophy area growth was 0·336 mm/year (SE 0·032) with avacincaptad pegol 2 mg and 0·392 mm/year (0·033) with sham, a difference in growth of 0·056 mm/year (95% CI 0·016-0·096; p=0·0064), representing a 14% difference between the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and the sham group. Ocular treatment-emergent adverse events in the study eye occurred in 110 (49%) patients in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and 83 (37%) in the sham group. There were no endophthalmitis, intraocular inflammation, or ischaemic optic neuropathy events over 12 months. To month 12, macular neovascularisation in the study eye occurred in 15 (7%) patients in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and nine (4%) in the sham group, with exudative macular neovascularisation occurring in 11 (5%) in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and seven (3%) in the sham group. INTERPRETATION: Monthly avacincaptad pegol 2 mg was well tolerated and showed significantly slower geographic atrophy growth over 12 months than sham treatment, suggesting that avacincaptad pegol might slow disease progression and potentially change the trajectory of disease for patients with geographic atrophy. FUNDING: Iveric Bio, An Astellas Company.

Potential for Treatment Interval Extension in Eyes with nAMD Disease Activity Post Loading Phase in HAWK and HARRIER.

INTRODUCTION: The HAWK and HARRIER studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Based on the study design, brolucizumab-treated eyes adjusted to a q8w regimen because the presence of disease activity (DA) at the end of the matched loading phase (Week 16) could not subsequently extend to a q12w interval. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess subsequent DA in this subgroup to determine the potential for interval extensions during the first year of treatment. METHODS: Pooled data from the brolucizumab 6 mg arms and aflibercept arms of HAWK and HARRIER were included. Presence of DA was determined by the masked investigator based on their assessment of functional and anatomical parameters measured by optical coherence tomography. DA was compared at DA assessments, conducted at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44; fluid was also assessed at the primary analysis at Week 48. RESULTS: Fewer brolucizumab- (22.8%) than aflibercept-treated (32.2%) eyes had DA at the first DA assessment at Week 16. In eyes with investigator-identified DA at Week 16, BCVA change from baseline to Week 96 was comparable between treatment arms. Fewer brolucizumab- than aflibercept-treated eyes had DA at each subsequent DA assessment in Year 1: 31.8% vs 39.1% (Week 20), 27.3% vs 43.5% (Week 32), and 17.3% vs 31.2% (Week 44). Fewer eyes treated with brolucizumab than aflibercept had intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid: 35.3% vs 43.5% (Week 20), 55.8% vs 69.6% (Week 32), 30.0% vs 43.1% (Week 44), and 48.6% vs 68.6% (Week 48). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that, in eyes that still had DA 8 weeks after the final dose of loading phase, brolucizumab-treated eyes had improved fluid resolution and higher potential for treatment interval extension than aflibercept-treated eyes during the first year of treatment.

Sustained Ocular Delivery of Bevacizumab Using Densomeres in Rabbits: Effects on Molecular Integrity and Bioactivity.

Purpose: To demonstrate that a single administration of an anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibody, when integrated into a novel biodegradable Densomere composed only of the active pharmaceutical ingredient and polymer, maintains molecular integrity, sustained release, and prolonged bioactivity in vitro and in vivo for up to 12 months. Methods: Bevacizumab, a high-molecular-weight antibody (140,000-150,000 Da) was incorporated at 5% loading into Densomere microparticle carriers (DMCs) for injection to observe in vitro release over time from an aqueous suspension. The molecular integrity of the released bevacizumab was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and size-exclusion chromatography-high-performance liquid chromatography (SEC-HPLC). Anti-angiogenic bioactivity in vivo was assessed using the rabbit corneal suture model for suppression of neovascular encroachment from the limbus following a single subconjunctival administration. Results: Continuous release of bevacizumab in vitro was observed in serial samples over a period of 12 months. ELISA and SEC-HPLC yielded profiles from aqueous supernatant samples indistinguishable from the reference bevacizumab. A single subconjunctival administration in rabbit eyes significantly suppressed corneal neovascularization in vivo compared to control eyes for 12 months. Conclusions: The Densomere carrier platform maintained the molecular integrity of bevacizumab with a prolonged release profile in vitro and demonstrated sustained in vivo drug delivery with continuous bioactivity in the rabbit cornea eye model for 12 months. Translational Relevance: The Densomere platform provides a significant opportunity for prolonged delivery of biologics in ocular and other tissues.

Physicochemical and Biological Stability Assessment of SB11 (Ranibizumab Biosimilar) Under Ambient and In-Use Storage for Intravitreal Administration.

INTRODUCTION: SB11 (Byooviz™) is a ranibizumab biosimilar that acts as a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A inhibitor. Stability data for unopened SB11 vials at room temperature are limited and no data are available for SB11 withdrawn into syringes (in-use) for intravitreal administration. METHODS: SB11 stability was assessed in two different settings: unopened vials stored at 30 ± 2 °C/65 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) for 2 months, and in-use SB11 withdrawn into syringes stored at 5 ± 3 °C for 98 days and then 25 ± 2 °C/60 ± 5% RH for 24 h. The product was stored in the absence of light, and the experimental design followed International Conference on Harmonization and European Medicines Agency requirements for stability evaluation of biological products. Analysis included visual appearance (color, clarity, and presence of visible particles), pH, protein concentration (A280) and purity (size-exclusion high-pressure liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis-sodium dodecyl sulfate, imaged capillary isoelectric focusing), biological activity (VEGF binding and neutralization), and safety (sub-visible particulates). RESULTS: Except for charge variants in unopened vials at room temperature after 1 month by US standards, all results met the stability acceptance criteria (US and EU) for both unopened vials and for in-use SB11. There were no major changes in terms of physicochemical stability, biological activity and sub-visible particulates. CONCLUSION: SB11 was stable for longer periods and at higher temperatures than what is stated in the labels of the reference product (Lucentis) and SB11. The physicochemical properties, biological activity, and sub-visible particulates of SB11 in both tested settings (unopened vials at room temperature and in-use product withdrawn into syringes) were maintained under the described storage periods. This information can help to avoid unnecessary delays in patient treatment without any loss in quality and biological activity, lower the workload of health care providers and reduce costs associated with drug waste.

Factors That Can Prolong Ocular Treatment Duration in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are used to treat wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD); however, they are associated with a considerable treatment burden and poor real-world outcomes. The molecular size and charge of anti-VEGF agents influence drug pharmacokinetics in the vitreous and peak drug efficacy. This article reviews the established and novel strategies to prolong drug action, in the vitreal cavity, and thus reduce dosing frequency. Increased ocular residency can be attained by increasing drug size as with large molecules, such as KSI-301; adding polyethylene glycol to pegcetacoplan (APL-2) or avacincaptad pegol to increase molecular size; or binding to other targets that increase molecular size, such as vitreal albumin in the case of BI-X. Faricimab is a bispecific antibody in which the fragment crystallizable portion is engineered to prolong ocular residency and reduce systemic exposure. Conversely, small VEGF-binding molecules, such as brolucizumab, can be administered at higher clinical doses, with the potential for prolonged clinical activity versus larger molecules. Other important considerations include sustained drug delivery routes, such as the ranibizumab port delivery system or subconjunctival or suprachoroidal injection. More effective and longer-lasting treatments are needed for wAMD to prolong drug action and reduce dosing frequency. Several strategies are under investigation and the prevention of vision loss in patients with AMD or other retinal diseases may be attainable in the near future.

Role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in the management of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy without centre-involving diabetic macular oedema: a meta-analysis of trials.

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in management of eyes with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) without centre involving diabetic macular oedema (CI-DMO). We searched multiple databases for all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated anti-VEGF treatment versus observation in eyes with NPDR without CI-DMO. Data was collected for six outcomes (best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement, diabetic retinopathy severity score (DRSS), central subfield thickness, progression to vision threatening complications (VTCs), ocular adverse events and quality of life measures). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) and certainty of evidence was assessed using Grade of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We identified a total of 2 unique RCTs that compared aflibercept and sham to treat a total of 811 eyes. For BCVA change, there was a small, clinically insignificant benefit for aflibercept treatment at year 2 (MD 0.70, 95% CI 0.02-1.38, GRADE rating: MODERATE). DRSS demonstrated a statistically significant improvement with aflibercept use at year 2 (RR 3.76, 95% CI 2.75-5.13, GRADE rating: MODERATE). VTCs were significantly less in aflibercept arm at year 2 (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.23-0.40, GRADE rating: MODERATE). In conclusion, aflibercept treatment versus observation in eyes with NPDR without CI-DMO can result in reduced risk of development of VTCs and regression of DRSS score over 2 years. Future trials are needed to increase the precision of the treatment effect and to provide data on quality-of-life metrics.PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021288608.

Role of Positioning after Full-Thickness Macular Hole Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

TOPIC: The importance of postoperative face-down positioning (FDP) to achieve anatomic and functional success after full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) surgery is explored in this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is considerable variability in clinical practices regarding the need and length of FDP recommended to patients after FTMH surgery. There is also a lack of robust clinical guidelines on the topic. As such, an updated estimate of the effect size of FDP on clinically important outcomes is critical to inform practice. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and SCOPUS databases were searched from inception to October 3, 2021, for RCTs evaluating FDP versus non-FDP (nFDP). Data were collected for 7 clinically important outcomes after macular hole surgery: closure rate, visual acuity (VA) improvement, recurrence of FTMH, visual function, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and complication rates. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) to assess the risk of bias and followed the Grade of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty in the evidence across outcomes. We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects modeling. Subgroup analyses were carried out based on hole size, type of gas, and duration of FDP. RESULTS: Eight RCTs of 709 eyes were included. The relative risk (RR) of FTMH closure rate comparing FDP versus nFDP was RR 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99, 1.12, P = 0.09, I2 = 44%, GRADE rating: LOW). The mean difference (MD) regarding VA improvement comparing FDP and nFDP was MD -0.07 (95% CI: -0.12 to 0.01, P = 0.03, I2 = 16%, GRADE rating: LOW). CONCLUSION: The current review did not demonstrate a difference between FDP and nFDP with respect to FTMH closure, although the CIs were wide. There was a visual benefit to FDP; however, the CIs included values of trivial clinical significance. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the VA benefit observed was driven by large holes. Limited data precluded analysis regarding the rate of FTMH recurrence, measures of visual function, quality of life measures, and patient satisfaction metrics. Further prospective trials are required to assess the gaps in the literature and improve the certainty of evidence for the outcomes examined.

ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR BIOSIMILARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies have proven effective in treating retinal diseases but come with a high financial burden to the patient and health care system. Biosimilar drugs present an opportunity to decrease the cost of these important ophthalmic medications, and several ophthalmic biosimilars are expected to be approved and enter the market in the coming years. The objectives of this review are to educate ophthalmologists on the safety and efficacy of biosimilars in ophthalmology in the United States and European Union, review the biosimilar manufacturing and approval process, and describe the upcoming ophthalmic biosimilars. RESULTS: Two ranibizumab biosimilars are currently approved in the United States and European Union. Additional ranibizumab biosimilars, as well as biosimilars for aflibercept and bevacizumab, are currently in clinical development. CONCLUSION: Biosimilar use in ophthalmology is expected to grow with the patent expiration of two major anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs, ranibizumab and aflibercept, and the development of an ophthalmology-specific bevacizumab biosimilar. Financial savings from biosimilar use in ophthalmology have the potential to reduce economic burden, increase treatment adherence, and ultimately improve health outcomes.